Greetings from Jerusalem, this is Israel at War on TV7 News, and it marks the 90th day of Israel’s conflict with Hamas. I’m Amir Orin, filling in for Jonathan Hassen, accompanied by two Air Force Brigadier Generals in the reserve – Donon Gavish and Yon Rosen. Donon, former commander of the Israeli air defense and missile defense, and currently leading the Israeli task force on the same subject. Welcome, Donon. Yon Rosen, former base commander with extensive flying experience in the Air Force. Welcome to you as well.

As we hit the 90-day milestone, Donon, we observe a noticeable decline in Hamas’ missile and rocket launches. Even on New Year’s Day, they attempted a barrage at Metropolitan Tel Aviv, but failed. Does this indicate they’re running out of rockets, or might they be strategically reserving a last salvo for the war’s final stages?

In addressing the rocket threat, the IDF employs a comprehensive strategy, involving attack, alert, and both active and passive defense. The Air Force and ground forces collaboratively target Hamas launch sites, diminishing their capabilities. The alert system, backed by intelligence, aims to warn the Israeli population effectively. Active defense, such as Iron Dome interceptions, complements passive defense measures. Today, we witness the success of this strategy in action.

Recently, the assassination of Hamas leader Aruri in Beirut, an event not officially claimed by Israel. Do you anticipate a potential response from Hamas in Lebanon, considering Israel’s involvement, and could Kisala supply them with rockets?

Strategically, Israel maintains consistency, focusing on the southern attack and northern active defense against Hamas. The IDF’s commitment to strike Hamas leaders underscores the determination. Regarding Aruri’s assassination, Israel neither confirms nor denies involvement. The IDF spokesman emphasized the fight against Hamas, not Lebanon. Kisala may decide to support Hamas, given the incident’s impact on their prestige.

Donon, in such targeted operations, a precision-guided munition enters a window with minimal collateral damage. Has technology evolved since Bin Laden’s killing, and does the choice of platform, be it a fighter plane, helicopter, or UAV, impact such operations?

Indeed, high-level intelligence is crucial for precision attacks. Technological advancements in munitions over the past decade allow for precise strikes with minimized collateral impact. The choice of platform depends on the munition and its deployment capabilities. These operations require sophistication, often conducted from the air, ensuring minimal risk.

As we navigate this conflict, communication plays a crucial role. While Israel communicates its strategy through official announcements, others use third parties. The recent special operation to free hostages emphasizes the complexity of negotiations during war. Coercion and diplomacy need a delicate balance for a successful resolution.

Regarding Special Operations, Yon, Israel has elite units for such purposes, like Chalda. What goes into the training and planning for these operations, and how does it differ between times of war and peace?

Special Operations demand meticulous planning and training, especially during war. The context drastically differs from peacetime attempts. Coercion, diplomacy, and a well-orchestrated plan are essential, acknowledging the challenges in hostage situations. Timely negotiation initiation is crucial for a successful resolution.

As American Emissary Amos Hawkin engages in regional diplomacy, Qatar’s role as a mediator between Israel and Hamas is noteworthy. Reports suggest the American Air Base in Qatar supports Israel. How significant is this support, and what impact does it have on the conflict?

Qatar’s mediation is vital, and the reported support from the American Air Base is appreciated by the IDF. The backing underscores the complex dynamics of regional relationships. The U.S. remains a pivotal player in the Middle East, impacting the ongoing conflict.